www.vuletic.com/hume
Darwin's Sacred Cause
Defender's Guide to Science and Creationism
Assertion: An old moon would be covered with a deep layer of meteoritic dust.

Mark I. Vuletic
e-mail

Last updated 3 December 2008

Analysis

(i) The calculation that led to the prediction of a deep dust layer was based upon a speculative estimate of influx of meteoritic dust that has since been proven incorrect. The actual influx of dust is considerably smaller, and consistent with the standard scientific timescale of the age of the moon. (Ecker 1990:183).

(ii) To its credit, the young-earth creationist organization Answers in Genesis has completely disavowed the moon-dust argument. In an AiG article, creationists Snelling and Rush conclude:

Calculations show that the amount of meteoritic dust in the surface dust layer, and that which trace element analyses have shown to be in the regolith, is consistent with the current meteoritic dust influx rate operating over the evolutionists' timescale. While there are some unresolved problems with the evolutionists' case, the moon dust argument, using uniformitarian assumptions to argue against an old age for the moon and the solar system, should for the present not be used by creationists. (Snelling and Rush 1993)

References

Snelling AA and Rush DE. 1993. Moon dust and the age of the solar system. TJ 7(1):2-42.

Ecker R. 1990. Dictionary of Science and Creationism. Buffalo: Prometheus.

Please take a minute to help me improve this site by e-mailing me your feedback. If you have a factual dispute, please assist my research by pointing me to references supporting your claim. I regret that I usually will be unable to reply in a timely fashion, but I will read everything sent to me, and will alter or add to the content of my site as needed. My appreciation for polite feedback may safely be assumed.